Hillary Clinton ran an awful 2016 campaign.

There’s no other way to put it.

She had the money.  The establishment in her pocket.  The media’s unwavering support.

And she blew it.

We all know that she was an absolutely terrible candidate with the personality of a coffee table and a record that makes John Edwards look not so bad but it goes deeper than that. Her campaign was severely mismanaged.

You won’t believe this detail I’m about to lay on you…

Hillary was so confident in her “blue wall” of Rust Belt states that she spent more television advertisement money in Omaha than she did in Michigan and Wisconsin combined.  COMBINED.  We heard for months about how Trump’s message was perfectly catered to the working class Democrats in the Rust Belt and Hillary decided to spend more money in one Nebraska congressional district (that she didn’t win) than two entire states that were clearly up in the air.

You deserve to lose the election at that point.

It gets better.

The election was about three months ago and apparently, Hillary is still not owning up to the $1.2 billion fiasco that she forced us to watch.

Guess who she is blaming?

From Washington Examiner:

To sum it up: Hillary Clinton‘s failed campaign team reportedly blames former President Barack Obama for their stunning loss last November, arguing that his White House didn’t do enough to combat the negative press resulting from her email scandal and from the allegedly Russian-led hacks.

The reported explained:

Clintonites feel that if Obama had come out early and forcefully with evidence of Russian interference in the campaign, and perhaps quicker sanctions, she might be president today. His caution, they argue, allowed the public to have a foggy sense of clear, calculated, consistent Russian meddling in the campaign.

We can’t stress enough how upset some Democrats are. It’s testing relationships between Clinton and Obama loyalists. It’s making efforts to form a new Trump opposition coalition harder.

Classic Hillary.

If anything, Obama was the only reason things were close.  Yeah, he was an awful president but liberals absolutely adore him and clearly many Democrat voters were hoping Hillary would continue his policies even if they didn’t necessarily like her.

It’s fitting that a career politician who made a living being out of touch would remain out of touch until the bitter end.

It almost wouldn’t make sense for her to take responsibility.  She has literally never done that with anything in her public life before ever.

Democrats better take notice.  Study everything that Hillary did on the campaign trail in 2016 and do the exact opposite in 2020.

Or don’t.  Your funeral.

Advertisements